Research

Spotify

A UX research study examining how listeners discover new music on Spotify — and where the platform's recommendation systems support or undermine genuine exploration.

Role UX Researcher
Timeline 6 weeks, 2024
Methods Interviews, Diary Study, Affinity Mapping
Type UX Research
Spotify research — overview

Overview

Spotify's recommendation engine is one of the most sophisticated in consumer software. But recommendations optimized for engagement don't always feel like discovery. This study asked: what do listeners actually experience when they try to find new music they love — and what gets in the way?

Over six weeks, I recruited 10 participants across different listening profiles (casual, enthusiast, niche-genre) and combined diary study entries with semi-structured interviews to understand their discovery journeys in depth.


Methods

  • Diary Study
  • Semi-Structured Interviews
  • Screen Recording Sessions
  • Affinity Mapping
  • Thematic Analysis

Participants logged their listening experiences three times a week for four weeks, noting when they discovered something new, how, and how they felt about it. Sessions were followed by hour-long interviews using a protocol designed to surface mental models around "discovery" vs. "familiarity."

Screen recordings captured actual in-app behavior, which often diverged from what participants reported in diaries — a productive gap that became one of the study's central tensions.

"I always say I want to find new stuff, but when I open the app I just go back to what I know."

Key Findings

01

Discovery and listening are different modes. Participants rarely discovered and listened in the same session — discovery required a particular kind of open, exploratory attention that didn't coexist with background listening.

02

Algorithmic recommendations were trusted but not loved. Participants relied on Discover Weekly but described it as "safe" — rarely surprising, rarely emotionally resonant in the way a friend's recommendation could be.

03

Social discovery was underutilized but highly valued. When participants did discover something via a friend, collaborator, or live show, the emotional attachment was significantly higher than algorithmically-surfaced music.

04

Genre boundaries created friction. Several participants in niche genres found that the recommendation engine would surface popular-adjacent music rather than deep cuts — flattening their listening identity over time.

Affinity map — discovery themes Interview notes and coding

Recommendations

Based on findings, I developed three design recommendations for Spotify's discovery experience: (1) a distinct "exploration mode" that signals to the user — and the algorithm — that they are open to unfamiliar territory; (2) strengthening social sharing flows so friend recommendations are surfaced more prominently in discovery contexts; and (3) giving users more visibility and control over the signals that feed their taste profile.

These recommendations were presented as a research report with annotated wireframe sketches illustrating possible UI directions for each, though the project scope was research rather than design execution.

← Sounds of Aulus Next: Sephora →